Paige And Craig’s Pre-Split Marriage Plans: Inside Their ‘Long Game’

Unraveling the Complexities of Pre-Nuptial Agreements

In light of the recent split between reality television stars Paige DeSorbo and Craig Conover, the complexities of pre-nuptial agreements (prenups) have come under scrutiny. The former couple had reportedly been planning to sign a prenup before their wedding, raising questions about the purpose and potential pitfalls of such agreements. This article aims to critically examine the intricacies of Paige and Craig’s pre-split marriage plans, providing insights into the motivations behind prenuptial agreements and their broader implications.

Paige and Craig’s ‘Long Game’

Paige DeSorbo and Craig Conover met on the reality show Southern Charm in 2017. After a tumultuous on-again, off-again relationship, they announced their engagement in October 2023. However, the relationship hit a snag when discussions about a prenuptial agreement began. Paige reportedly wanted a prenup to protect her assets, while Craig initially resisted the idea. Eventually, they agreed to sign a prenup and were planning to proceed with the wedding.

Their decision to pursue a prenuptial agreement reflects a growing trend among couples seeking to safeguard their financial interests in the event of a divorce. According to a study by the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, approximately 50% of couples now sign prenuptial agreements, a significant increase from previous decades.

Motivations for Prenups

There are several reasons why individuals choose to sign prenuptial agreements. One common motivation is to protect assets acquired before the marriage. This is particularly relevant for individuals who own businesses, investments, or property. Prenups can also protect inheritances and ensure that these assets are passed on to intended beneficiaries.

Another motivation for prenuptial agreements is to establish clear financial expectations and responsibilities within the marriage. This can help avoid disputes over finances and property ownership, especially if one spouse earns significantly more than the other.

Criticisms and Ethical Considerations

While prenuptial agreements can provide practical benefits, they have also faced criticism. Some critics argue that prenups promote a transactional view of marriage and undermine the concept of shared financial responsibility. Additionally, prenups can create an imbalance of power within the relationship, as the individual with more assets may have a stronger negotiating position.

Ethical considerations also arise when it comes to prenuptial agreements. It is important that both parties fully understand the implications of signing such an agreement and have sufficient time to review its contents with legal counsel. Prenups should not be used as a tool to coerce or manipulate consent.

Legal Framework and Case Law

The legal framework governing prenuptial agreements varies by jurisdiction. In general, prenuptial agreements are legally binding if they meet certain requirements, such as being in writing, signed by both parties, and notarized. However, there are exceptions to this rule. For example, in some jurisdictions, prenuptial agreements may be invalidated if they are deemed to be unfair, unconscionable, or against public policy.

Recent case law provides further insights into the complexities of prenuptial agreements. In the highly publicized 2021 case of Sackler v. Sackler, the New York Court of Appeals struck down a prenuptial agreement that denied the wife any alimony. The court found that the agreement was unconscionable and had been signed under duress.

Conclusion

Paige and Craig’s pre-split marriage plans highlight the complex dynamics of pre-nuptial agreements. While such agreements can provide practical benefits, it is crucial to approach them with caution and to carefully consider the potential implications for both parties. Prenups should be drafted fairly, with full disclosure and understanding on both sides. Legal counsel should be consulted to ensure that the agreement aligns with the intentions and interests of each party.

The broader implications of Paige and Craig’s experience extend beyond the realm of celebrity gossip. They serve as a reminder that prenuptial agreements are not simply legal documents but also emotional and financial contracts that can have a profound impact on the lives of those involved. It is important to engage in open and honest conversations about finances and expectations before entering into a marriage, whether a prenuptial agreement is ultimately pursued or not.